Article 6: Code of Conduct

Topics ✦ Created with AI

  • Governance & Institutions: Transparency in Governance, Public Procurement
  • Participation & Consultation: Citizen Involvement

6.1 Basic principles

Members commit to the four principles of open government: transparency, citizen engagement, accountability, and technological innovation to promote the previous 3 principles. They act with integrity and ethics. All members have equal voice and rights.

6.2 Transparency and conflict of interest

Mandatory declaration of interests, notification of conflict and abstention from relevant decisions, prohibition of acceptance of gifts or benefits.

6.3 Confidentiality

Closed sessions are governed by the Chatham House Rule. Strict compliance with GDPR. Public statements only by authorised persons, with a clear distinction of personal views from positions of the Forum.

6.4 Ethics Committee

A three-member ethics committee examines violations. Scaling-up of sanctions: oral remark → written reprimand → temporary suspension (1-3 months) → definitive dismissal. Right to be heard by any member before the imposition of a sanction.

6.5 Revision

The Code shall be revised every two years or whenever deemed necessary by the Plenary Assembly by a 2/3 majority.

AI Discussion Summary

✦ Created with AI
Executive Summary – Merging Article Proposals

—

a. What should be implemented


*Establish a clear, unified framework that enhances transparency, conflict of interest management, and ethical assessment.*

  • Standard procedure for declaration of conflicts of interest
  • – Mandatory direct declaration by each member.
    – Automatic removal of a member in case of non-declaration or detected conflict.

  • Statement of improved efficiency in the Greek reality
  • – Incorporation of a clause pointing out that the proposal "improves efficiency in the Greek reality".

  • Publication of a summary register of interests
  • – Published in the context of transparency and trust of participants.

  • Chemistry Guide (Chatham House Rule)
  • – Accompanies the rule with a clear guide to confidentiality.
    – Precise criteria are set for what is considered confidential.

  • Criteria for assessing infringements
  • – Introduction of clear, non-negotiable evaluation criteria.
    – Abolition of any vague or ambiguous wording.
    – Inclusion of an explicit statement on the integrity of the evaluation process.

  • Mediation (intermediate) assessment of new ethical issues
  • – Mechanisms for early detection and response to emerging ethical challenges.
    – Integrating a scientific basis into ethics (e.g. “healthy reasoning”, analysis of human errors).

    —

    b. Rejection points (What shouldn't be implemented)


  • No opinion was identified as inappropriate or unbusiness.

  • —

    c. General proposals & strategic ideas


    | Strategy | Description |
    |————|———–|
    | Strengthening a COI management mechanism | Establishing uniform, transparent and fast-track rules for all members. |
    | Transparency & Trust | Publication of a register of interests and a guide to confidential communication to strengthen the trust of participants. |
    | Preventive ethical approach | Incorporate a mid-term evaluation of ethical issues so that they are addressed in a timely manner. |
    | Merging Ethics & Scientific Knowledge | Use of scientific data (health logic, probabilistic error analysis) as a basis for ethical decisions. |

    —

    d. Required modifications to current content


    1. Add standard COI declaration procedure – direct declaration and automatic removal clause in case of non-compliance.
    2. Incorporating a statement of improved efficiency in the Greek reality.
    3. Inclusion of a register of interests with a clear reference to transparency.
    4. Chatham House Guide Integration and setting confidentiality criteria.
    5. Introduction of clear infringement assessment criteria· removal of ambiguities and explicit reference to the inviolability of the procedure.
    6. Add Interim Ethical Assessment Module outlining the steps to be taken in a timely manner.
    7. Stimulating the scientific background of ethics – citing examples of "healthy reasoning" and human error analysis.
    8. Correction of an existing language to reflect new, clear specifications and avoid any ambiguous or ambiguous wording.

    With the implementation of the above changes, the article will gain greater transparency, consistency and scientific documentation, enhancing the trust of its members and its effectiveness in the Greek reality.

    Comments

    4 responses to “Article 6: Code of Conduct”

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



    1. Ethics should be based on scientific foundations such as the model of healthy cognition and the model of human error. This process is described in the attached paper which will be presented on 25-6-2026 at the 10th Congress of the Greek Sociological Society. I would therefore be grateful if this paper would not be published before the presentation at this conference.

      🤖 AI AnalysisℹAI analyzed this comment and extracted the main posts expressed by the author. Each position is broken down into arguments – click to see them.✦ Created with AI
      📍 Include scientific bases (healthy reasoning, human error) for ethics 1 business
      🟢 Ethics should rely on scientific foundations

      +0
    2. Christoforos Arvanitis
      Christoforos Arvanitis

      If a member (or the body they represent) has a direct or indirect financial or professional interest in a specific commitment or public project being discussed in the Forum (e.g. claiming a state tender or funding resulting from the commitment), they are obliged to declare it immediately to the Co-Presidency. In such cases, the member shall be automatically excluded from the process of forming, finalising or voting on the matter in question, in order to ensure the fairness of the procedure.

      🤖 AI AnalysisℹAI analyzed this comment and extracted the main posts expressed by the author. Each position is broken down into arguments – click to see them.✦ Created with AI
      📍 To require an immediate declaration of interest and an automatic opt-out of the member 1 business
      🟢 Ensures the integrity of the process

      +0
    3.  avatar
      Anonymous

      Article 6 sets out a robust ethical framework, aligned with the principles of open governance and international practices. The provision for declaration of interests, confidentiality rules and cascading sanctions strengthens the institutional credibility of the Forum. In order to function effectively in the Greek reality, it would be useful to standardise the procedure for declaring a conflict of interest, as well as to publish a summary register of interests for transparency purposes.

      In addition, the Ethics Committee would benefit from clear infringement assessment criteria to avoid ambiguities, while the application of the Chatham House rule should be accompanied by a guide on what is considered confidential. Finally, the biennial review is positive, but it would be useful to provide for a mid-term evaluation when new ethical issues arise.

      Overall, the framework is robust and modern, but it needs a little more clarity and transparency to ensure consistent implementation and trust of all parties.


      +0
    4. CHRISTOS CHAHOUDIS avatar
      CHRISTOS CHAHOUDIS

      Article 6 sets out a robust ethical framework, aligned with the principles of open governance and international practices. The provision for declaration of interests, confidentiality rules and cascading sanctions strengthens the institutional credibility of the Forum. In order to function effectively in the Greek reality, it would be useful to standardise the procedure for declaring a conflict of interest, as well as to publish a summary register of interests for transparency purposes.

      In addition, the Ethics Committee would benefit from clear infringement assessment criteria to avoid ambiguities, while the application of the Chatham House rule should be accompanied by a guide on what is considered confidential. Finally, the biennial review is positive, but it would be useful to provide for a mid-term evaluation when new ethical issues arise.

      Overall, the framework is robust and modern, but it needs a little more clarity and transparency to ensure consistent implementation and trust of all parties.

      🤖 AI AnalysisℹAI analyzed this comment and extracted the main posts expressed by the author. Each position is broken down into arguments – click to see them.✦ Created with AI
      📍 Standardisation of a conflict of interest declaration procedure 1 business
      🟢 Improves effectiveness in Greek reality
      📍 Publication of a summary register of interests for transparency 1 business
      🟢 Increases transparency and trust
      📍 Introduction of clear infringement assessment criteria 1 business
      🟢 Prevents ambiguities in the assessment of infringements
      📍 Accompanying Chatham House Rule with Confidentiality Guide 1 business
      🟢 Determines what is considered confidential, reducing uncertainty
      📍 Provision for a mid-term evaluation of new ethical issues 1 business
      🟢 Allows new ethical issues to be addressed in a timely manner

      +0