Topics ✦ Created with AI
- Environment & Climate: Climate adaptation
- Participation & Consultation: Citizens' Participation, Citizens' Assemblies
- Governance & Institutions: Regional & Spatial Planning Policy
The Multilateral Forum shall be composed of members with a balanced representation between government-public bodies and non-profit organisations.
Recognizing the need for flexibility and gradual adaptation to Greek conditions, three alternative composition models are proposed:
Model A — Compact (16 members: 8+8)
Ideal for a quick start with a smaller number of members that facilitates coordination and quorum achievement. It is suitable for a pilot phase that will allow testing the operating mechanisms before expansion.
Model B – Optimum (18 members: 9+9)
It offers a balance between broad representation and effective functioning. Corresponding in size to the Australian Multilateral Forum.
Model C – Full (22 members: 11+11)
It provides maximum representation, following the Italian model that has been established and has been operating successfully since 2022. It is suitable for wider participation and coverage of more thematic areas.
Government members (according to the full model — 11 seats, proportional reduction to the smallest):
- Representative of the Ministry of Digital Governance (Government Coordinator)
- Representatives of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice
- Representative of the National Transparency Authority
- Two representatives of the Regions (alternates)
- Two representatives of Municipalities through KEDE
- Representative of an Independent Authority (alternate)
- Two representatives of other Ministries (alternates)
Non-governmental members (according to the full model — 11 seats, proportional reduction to the smallest):
- Five NGO representatives (openness, transparency, accountability)
- Two academic/research community representatives
- Representative of journalistic associations
- Representative of the technological community
- Representative of a youth organisation
- Representative of organisation of vulnerable groups
The choice of the final model will take into account the available resources, the maturity of the ecosystem and the possibility of support from the Secretariat. Gradual scaling is possible, starting with a smaller model.
AI Discussion Summary
✦ Created with AI
Summary Report – Merging Feedback
This is followed by a consolidated and structured presentation of the proposals that emerged from the different comment groups. Proposals have been classified according to the defined categories, avoiding repetitions and ensuring the logical coherence of the text.
—
Change of name: Rename the category "Government Members" to ‘Institutions’. Elimination of bipolar discrimination: Removal or consolidation of the terms ‘NGO State’ so as not to create controversy. Increased Accuracy: Integrate data/methods that enhance the scientific and operational accuracy of the text. Inclusion of new theoretical frameworks: – Addition of model C.
– Integration of the Four Pillars Model.
– Structural rewriting so that the composition includes four equal groups.
Wording on differences in the number of members: Incorporation of a statement that any discrepancies in the number of members are limited and do not cause functional malfunctions. Enhancing representativeness: Adding elements that ensure wider geographical and social representativeness teams. Representative rotation mechanism: Establishment of a periodic procedure transfer / rotation representatives to avoid stagnation. Transparency in the selection process: – Description clear, publishable selection procedure.
– Introduction open call for submission of proposals/registrations by all interested parties.
– Determination and disclosure evaluation criteria.
Regular evaluation mechanism: Establishment of a procedure evaluation of the model on a regular basis to ensure adaptability. Adaptability and maturity: Addition of a clause ensuring the Continuous adaptation of the model changing user needs and maturity.
—
Representation of differences in the number of members as a serious problem – should not be presented as a source of malfunction or critical concern. No other sentence was flagged as replacement or subtraction.
—
| Sector | Strategy | Purpose |
|——–|————|——–|
| Transparency & Impartiality | Integrating Commitment for transparency and open call | Strengthening stakeholder confidence |
| Diversity | Promotion geographical, social and institutional diversity | Cultivating more balanced and representative decision-making |
| Stability & Evolution | Application a mechanism for the rotation of representatives and regular evaluation | Prevention of stagnation and adaptation to new conditions |
| Frames & Structure | Adoption model C and the Four Pillars Model with four equal groups | Improving the theoretical basis and operational balance |
| Quality | Improvements for increased accuracy | Content Ensuring Scientific Validity and Practical Utility |
| Adaptability | Incorporation of provisions for adaptability and maturity the | Model Ensure long-term sustainability |
—
1. Title & Categories
– Replacement of “Government Members” with “Institutional Bodies”.
– Deletion or redesign of the section referring to the subheading ‘State-NGO’.
2. Accuracy & Theoretical Basis
– Incorporate paragraphs describing new elements/methods for improved accuracy.
– Update the section "Theoretical frameworks" to include the model C and the the Four Pillars Model.
– Correction of the composition description to refer to four equal groups.
3. Differences in Number of Members
– Remove or modify any statement implying that discrepancies in member numbers create malfunctions, adding paragraph that discrepancies are small and without negative consequences.
4. Representativeness & Toggle
– Add a section that analyzes the geographical and social representativeness.
– Insert paragraph for the a mechanism for the rotation of representatives (e.g., rotation rules, position time limits).
5. Transparency of Procedures
– Recording clear, publishable selection procedure (steps, responsible, timelines).
– Add a subtitle "Open Call" with instructions for submission of proposals/registrations.
– Presentation evaluation criteria (e.g. experience, representativeness, transparency).
6. Regular Evaluation & Adaptability
– Introduction of a new section "Evaluation & Adaptation" that provides for annual or half-yearly evaluations of the model.
– Determination adaptability measures and maturity indicators (e.g., user satisfaction indicators, controlled change scenarios).
With the implementation of the above, the article will remain consistent, transparent, flexible and representative of the interests of all stakeholders involved.
This is followed by a consolidated and structured presentation of the proposals that emerged from the different comment groups. Proposals have been classified according to the defined categories, avoiding repetitions and ensuring the logical coherence of the text.
—
1. Implementation of Recommendations
*What needs to be implemented in the article*– Integration of the Four Pillars Model.
– Structural rewriting so that the composition includes four equal groups.
– Introduction open call for submission of proposals/registrations by all interested parties.
– Determination and disclosure evaluation criteria.
—
2. Points of Rejection
*What should not be added or modified in the article*—
3. General Proposals & Strategic Ideas
*General strategic proposals and ideas*| Sector | Strategy | Purpose |
|——–|————|——–|
| Transparency & Impartiality | Integrating Commitment for transparency and open call | Strengthening stakeholder confidence |
| Diversity | Promotion geographical, social and institutional diversity | Cultivating more balanced and representative decision-making |
| Stability & Evolution | Application a mechanism for the rotation of representatives and regular evaluation | Prevention of stagnation and adaptation to new conditions |
| Frames & Structure | Adoption model C and the Four Pillars Model with four equal groups | Improving the theoretical basis and operational balance |
| Quality | Improvements for increased accuracy | Content Ensuring Scientific Validity and Practical Utility |
| Adaptability | Incorporation of provisions for adaptability and maturity the | Model Ensure long-term sustainability |
—
4. Required Modifications to Current Content
*What needs to be changed in the existing article*1. Title & Categories
– Replacement of “Government Members” with “Institutional Bodies”.
– Deletion or redesign of the section referring to the subheading ‘State-NGO’.
2. Accuracy & Theoretical Basis
– Incorporate paragraphs describing new elements/methods for improved accuracy.
– Update the section "Theoretical frameworks" to include the model C and the the Four Pillars Model.
– Correction of the composition description to refer to four equal groups.
3. Differences in Number of Members
– Remove or modify any statement implying that discrepancies in member numbers create malfunctions, adding paragraph that discrepancies are small and without negative consequences.
4. Representativeness & Toggle
– Add a section that analyzes the geographical and social representativeness.
– Insert paragraph for the a mechanism for the rotation of representatives (e.g., rotation rules, position time limits).
5. Transparency of Procedures
– Recording clear, publishable selection procedure (steps, responsible, timelines).
– Add a subtitle "Open Call" with instructions for submission of proposals/registrations.
– Presentation evaluation criteria (e.g. experience, representativeness, transparency).
6. Regular Evaluation & Adaptability
– Introduction of a new section "Evaluation & Adaptation" that provides for annual or half-yearly evaluations of the model.
– Determination adaptability measures and maturity indicators (e.g., user satisfaction indicators, controlled change scenarios).
With the implementation of the above, the article will remain consistent, transparent, flexible and representative of the interests of all stakeholders involved.
English
Leave a Reply